US War Crimes During the
Gulf War
By Francis Boyle
The following paper was presented by
FRANCIS A. BOYLE, Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign, to a symposium held by the Albany Law School. The symposium, held on
February 27, 1992, was titled: International War Crimes: The Search for Justice. This
paper documents the numerous occasions that international laws were broken and disregarded
during the Gulf War.
1. For the past year I have been working with the International Commission of Inquiry
into United States war crimes that were committed during the Persian Gulf War. This
Commission has conducted the largest independent world-wide investigation of war crimes in
history. Since last May [1991], the Commission has held thirty hearings across the United
States and in twenty countries across five continents to expose the war crimes that the
United States government inflicted upon the People and State of Iraq.
2. On Saturday, February 29, 1992 in New York City, at the Martin Luther, Jr.
Auditorium, the Commission will publicly present its evidence before an International War
Crimes Tribunal consisting of distinguished jurists and human rights activists drawn from
around the world. In the brief space that has been allotted to me, I would like to present
the basic gist of the charges that will be brought before the Tribunal against President
George Bush, Vice President Dan Quayle, Secretary of State Jim Baker, Secretary of Defense
Dick Cheney, National Security Assistant Brent Scowcroft, CIA Director William Webster,
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Colin Powell, General Norman Schwarzkopf,
and other members of the High Command of the United States military establishment who
launched and waged this brutal, inhumane, and criminal war. Hereinafter, these individuals
will be collectively referred to as the Defendants.
The Charges
3. The international crimes that have been charged and will be proven against these
Defendants consist principally of the three Nuremberg Offences: the Nuremberg Crime
Against Peace, that is waging an aggressive war and a war in violation of international
treaties and agreements; Nuremberg Crimes Against Humanity; and Nuremberg War Crimes. In
addition, these Defendants also committed grievous war crimes by wantonly violating the
Hague Regulations on Land Warfare of 1907; the Declaration of London on Sea Warfare of
1909; the Hague Draft Rules of Aerial Warfare of 1923; the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949
and their two Additional Protocols of 1977; and the international crimes of Genocide
against the People of Iraq as defined by the International Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of the Crimes of Genocide of 1948 as well as by the United States' own
Genocide Convention Implementation Act of 1987, 18 U.S.C. 1901. Finally, and most
heinously of all, these Defendants actually perpetrated a Nuremberg Crime against their
own troops when they forced them to take experimental biological weapons vaccines without
their informed consent in gross violation of the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation
that has been fully subscribed to by the United States government.
Universal Jurisdiction
4. These international crimes create personal criminal responsibility on the part of
all these Defendants that warrant their prosecution under basic norms of customary
international law, treaties, and statutes in any state of the world community that obtains
jurisdiction over them for the rest of their lives. We believe that the International War
Crimes Tribunal will produce a Judgment that can be put into the hands of every government
in the world with no injunction that should any of these Defendants ever appear within
their territorial jurisdiction, they must be apprehended and prosecuted for the commission
of the specified international crimes. Like unto pirates, these Defendants are hostes
humani generis - the enemies of all humankind!
The Historical Origins of the War
5. I do not have the time in this brief presentation to analyse the entire history of
illegal U.S. military interventionism into the Middle East - especially the Persian Gulf
region - and in particular its divide-and-conquer (divida et impera) policies. Suffice it
to say here that the "immediate cause" of the United States war to destroy Iraq
and take over the Arab oil fields in the Persian Gulf goes back to the 1973 Arab oil
boycott of Europe. The Arab oil states imposed the boycott in solidarity with those Arab
states that were then attempting to reclaim their Lands that had been illegally stolen
from Them by Israel in 1967. The Arab oil boycott brought Europe to its knees.
Subsequently, Arab oil states were able to increase the price of oil to a point of
economic fairness that would enable them to provide for the basic human needs of their own
Peoples.
6. But the success of the Arab oil boycott led several prominent U.S. government
officials in the Nixon administration, and especially Henry Kissinger, to publicly
threaten that the United States government would prepare itself to seize the Arab oil
fields in order to prevent something like the boycott from ever happening again. This
illegal governmental threat was stated openly, publicly, and repeatedly during the course
of the Nixon administration, the Ford administration, the Carter administration, and the
Reagan administration. The Bush administration would finally be the ones to carry this
threat out. But only after a decade of active preparations.
The Rapid Deployment Force
7. During the course of the Carter administration, the United States government
obtained authorisation from Congress to set up, arm, equip, and supply the so-called Rapid
Deployment Force (RDF), whose primary mission was to seize and steal the Arab oil-fields
of the Persian Gulf region. So the planning and preparations for the U.S. war against Iraq
go all the way back to the so-called "liberal" Carter administration - at the
very least. The United States Foreign Policy Establishment consists of liberal
imperialists, reactionary imperialists, and middle-of-the-road imperialists. But they all
share in common a firm belief in America's "Manifest Destiny" to rule the world.
8. For the next decade, the Pentagon obtained a new generation of high-technology
conventional weapons possessing massive destructive power and lethality; the logistical
support network necessary to convey a force of 500,000 soldiers over to the Persian Gulf
region within six months; and base access rights and facilities for that purpose
throughout Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. Working in conjunction with its de
facto allies in the region such as Egypt and Israel, the Pentagon stockpiled enormous
quantities of weapons, equipment, and supplies in the immediate vicinity of the Persian
Gulf as a prelude to military intervention. Hence, the United States government had been
planning, preparing, and conspiring to seize and steal the Persian Gulf oil fields for
over a decade.
United States War Plans Against Iraq
9. Sometime after the termination of the Iraq-Iran War in the Summer of 1988, the
Pentagon proceeded to revise its outstanding war plans for U.S. military intervention into
the Persian Gulf region in order to destroy Iraq. Defendant Schwarzkopf was put in charge
of this revision. For example, in early 1990, Defendant Schwarzkopf informed the Senate
Armed Services Committee of this new military strategy in the Gulf allegedly designed to
protect U.S. access to and control over Gulf oil in the event of regional conflicts. In
October 1990, Defendant Powell referred to the new military plan developed in 1989. After
the war, Defendant Schwarzkopf referred to eighteen months of planning for the campaign.
10. Sometime in late 1989 or early 1990, the Pentagon's war plan for destroying Iraq
and stealing Persian Gulf oil fields was put into motion. At that time, Defendant
Schwarzkopf was named the Commander of the so-called U.S. Central Command - which was the
renamed version of the Rapid Deployment Force - for the purpose of carrying out the war
plan that he had personally developed and supervised. During January of 1990, massive
quantities of United States weapons, equipment, and supplies were sent to Saudi Arabia in
order to prepare for the war against Iraq.
11. Pursuant to this war plan, Defendant Webster and the CIA assisted and directed
Kuwait in its actions of violating OPEC oil production agreements to undercut the price of
oil for the purpose of debilitating Iraq's economy; in extracting excessive and illegal
amounts of oil from pools it shared with Iraq; in demanding immediate repayment of loans
Kuwait had made to Iraq during the Iraq-Iran War; and in breaking off negotiations with
Iraq over these disputes. The Defendants intended to provoke Iraq into aggressive military
actions against Kuwait that they knew could be used to justify U.S. military intervention
into the Persian Gulf for the purpose of destroying Iraq and taking over Arab oil fields.
The U.S. "Green Light" to
Invade Kuwait
12. The Defendants showed absolutely no opposition to Iraq's increasing threats against
Iraq. Indeed, when Saddam Hussein requested U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie to explain State
Department testimony in Congress about Iraq's threats against Kuwait, she assured him that
the United States considered the dispute to be a regional concern, and that it would not
intervene militarily. In other words, the United States government gave Saddam Hussein
what amounted to a "green light" to invade Kuwait.
13. This reprehensible behaviour was similar to that of the Carter administration
during September of 1980, when United States government officials gave Saddam Hussein the
"green light" to invade Iran and thus commence the tragic Iraq-Iran War. A
decade later, Saddam Hussein simply surmised that he had been given yet another
"green light" by the United States government to commit overt aggression against
surrounding states. Only this time, the Defendants knowingly intended to lead Iraq into a
provocation that could be used to justify intervention and warfare by United States
military forces for the real purpose of destroying Iraq as a military power and seizing
Arab oil fields in the Persian Gulf.
Bush Is the Bigger War Criminal
14. On August 2, 1990, Iraq invaded and occupied Kuwait without significant resistance.
The Kuwaiti government itself estimated that approximately 300 people were killed as a
result of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and a few hundred more as a result of the military
occupation. By comparison, Defendant Bush's invasion of Panama in December of 1989 took
between 2,000 and 4,000 Panamanian lives, and the United States government is still
covering up the actual death toll. Defendant Bush killed more innocent people in Panama
than Saddam Hussein did in Kuwait.
15. Defendant Bush's invasion of Panama was even more illegal, reprehensible, and
criminal than Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait. The world must never forget that the
first step in the construction of Bush's "New World Order" was his illegal
invasion of Panama and the murder of thousands of completely innocent Panamanian
civilians. America's self-anointed policeman in the Persian Gulf had the blood of the
Panamanian People on his hands.
Bush's Perversion of the Constitution
16. Pursuant to the Pentagon's war plan for destroying Iraq and stealing Persian Gulf
oil fields - and without consultation or communication with Congress - Defendant Bush
initially ordered 40,000 U.S. military personnel into the Persian Gulf region during the
first week of August 1990. He lied to the American People and Congress when he stated that
his acts were purely defensive. Right from the very outset of this crisis - and even
beforehand - Defendant Bush fully intended to go to war against Iraq and to seize the Arab
oil fields in the Persian Gulf. Defendant Bush deliberately misled, deceived, concealed
and made false representations to the Congress to prevent its free deliberation and
informed exercise of legislative power.
17. Defendant Bush intentionally usurped Congressional power, ignored its authority,
and failed and refused to consult with the Congress. He individually ordered a naval
blockade against Iraq - itself an act of war - without approval by Congress or the U.N.
Security Council. Defendant Bush waited until after the November 1990 elections to
publicly announce his earlier order sending more than 200,000 additional military
personnel to the Persian Gulf for offensive purposes without seeking the approval of
Congress. Pursuant to the Pentagon's war plan, Defendant Bush switched U.S. forces from a
defensive position and capability to an offensive capacity for aggression against Iraq
without consultation with, and contrary to assurances given to, Congress and the American
People.
18. On the very eve of the war, Defendant Bush then strong-armed legislation through
Congress that approved enforcement of U.N. resolutions vesting absolute discretion in any
nation, providing no guidelines, and requiring no reporting to the United Nations.
Defendant Bush knew full well that he intended to destroy the armed forces and civilian
infrastructure of Iraq. Those acts were undertaken to enable him to commit a Nuremberg
Crime Against Peace and war crimes. This conduct violated the Constitution and Laws of the
United States and especially the War Powers Clause found in Article 1, Section 8 of the
Constitution, the U.S. War Powers Act of 1973, 87 Stat. 555, and the United Nations
Charter, which is the "Supreme Law of the Land" under Article 6 of the
Constitution. For this reason alone, Defendant Bush and his co-conspirators committed
"High Crimes and Misdemeanors" that warrant their impeachment, conviction,
removal from office, and criminal prosecution.
Bush's Mad Rush to War
19. While concealing his true intentions, Bush continued the military buildup of U.S.
forces from August into January 1991 for the purpose of attacking and destroying Iraq.
Bush pressed the military to expedite preparations and to commence the war against Iraq
before military conditions were optimum for domestic political purposes so that the war
would not interfere with his presidential re-election campaign. Indeed, the entire timing,
conduct and duration of the war were planned so as to promote Defendant Bush's re-election
prospects. But as a direct result of Defendant Bush's mad rush to war, United States
military personnel suffered needless casualties. Defendant Bush has still lied and covered
up to the American People and Congress the true nature and extent of U.S. casualties
during the Persian Gulf War.
Bush Corrupted the United Nations
20. Defendant Bush repeatedly coerced the members of the United Nations Security
Council into adopting an unprecedented series of resolutions that culminated in his
securing authority for any nation to use "all necessary means" to enforce these
resolutions. To secure these votes in the Security Council, Defendant Bush paid
multi-billion-dollar bribes; offered arms for regional wars; threatened and carried out
economic retaliation; illegally forgave multi-billion-dollar loans; offered diplomatic
relations despite human rights violations; and in other ways corruptly exacted votes. This
illegal activity subverted and perverted the very Purposes and Principles of the United
Nations Charter itself found in articles 1 and 2 thereof.
Bush Circumvented and Violated Chapter VI
of the United Nations Charter
21. In his mad rush to war, Defendant Bush caused the United Nations to completely
bypass Chapter VI of the U.N. Charter that mandates the specific settlement of
international disputes. Defendant Bush consistently rejected and ridiculed all of Iraq's
efforts to negotiate a peaceful resolution of the dispute. Defendant Bush proudly boasted
that there would be no negotiation, no compromise, no face-saving, etc.
22. Defendant Bush's successful attempt to subvert every effort for negotiating a
peaceful resolution of this dispute violated the solemn obligation mandating the peaceful
resolution of international disputes found in article 2, paragraph 3 of the United Nations
Charter; in article 33, paragraph 1 of the United Nations Charter; and in article 2 of the
Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928. Just like the Nazi war criminals before him, Defendant Bush
pursued recourse to war as an instrument of his national policy and for the solution of
international controversies in violation of article 1 of the Kellogg-Briand Pact. Just as
the Nazi war criminals did by invading Poland in September of 1939, these Defendants
perpetrated a Nuremberg Crime Against Peace in their decision to got to war against Iraq
and to seize and steal the oil resources of the Persian Gulf.
The Conduct of the War Itself
23. Obviously, in the brief space that has been allotted to me, there is no way that I
could adequately describe all of the atrocities and war crimes that were committed by
these Defendants and their Agents during the course of their actual conduct of military
hostilities against the People and State of Iraq. These matters have been covered in great
detail during the course of the public investigations and hearings conducted around the
world by the Commission during the past year. Nonetheless, I will provide you here with a
succinct account of the major categories of war crimes committed by these Defendants
during the course of their criminal war against Iraq.
Bush Ordered the Destruction of
Facilities Essential to Civilian Life and Economic Productivity Throughout Iraq
24. Systematic aerial and missile bombardment of Iraq was ordered to begin at 6:30 p.m.
E.S.T. January 16, 1991, in order to be reported on prime time TV. The bombing continued
for 42 days. It met no resistance from Iraqi aircraft and no effective anti-aircraft or
anti-missile ground fire. Iraq was basically defenceless.
25. Most of the targets were civilian facilities. The United States intentionally
bombed and destroyed centres for civilian life, commercial and business districts,
schools, hospitals, mosques, churches, shelters, residential areas, historical sites,
private vehicles and civilian government offices. In aerial attacks, including strafing,
over cities, towns, the countryside and highways, United States aircraft bombed and
strafed indiscriminately. The purpose of these attacks was to destroy life and property,
and generally to terrorise the civilian population of Iraq. The net effect was the summary
execution and corporal punishment indiscriminately of men, women and children, young and
old, rich and poor, of all nationalities and religions.
26. As a direct result of this bombing campaign against civilian life, at least 25,000
men, women and children were killed. The Red Crescent Society of Jordan estimated 113,000
civilian dead, 60% of them children, the week before the end of the war. According to the
Nuremberg Charter, this "wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages" is a
Nuremberg War Crime.
27. The intention and effort of this bombing campaign against civilian life and
facilities was to systematically destroy Iraq's infrastructure leaving it in a
pre-industrial condition. The U.S. assault left Iraq in near apocalyptic conditions as
reported by the first United Nations observers after the war. As a direct, intentional and
foreseeable result of this anti-civilian destruction, over one hundred thousand people
have died after the war from dehydration, dysentery, diseases, and malnutrition caused by
impure water, inability to obtain effective medical assistance and debilitation from
hunger, cold, shock and distress. More will die until potable water, sanitary living
conditions, adequate food supplies and other necessities are provided. Yet Defendant Bush
continues to impose punitive economic sanctions against the People of Iraq in order to
prevent this from happening.
The United States Intentionally Bombed
and Destroyed Defenceless Iraqi Military Personnel; Used Excessive Force; Killed Soldiers
Seeking to Surrender and in Disorganised Individual Flight, Often Unarmed and Far from Any
Combat Zones; Randomly and Wantonly Killed Iraqi Soldiers; and Destroyed Material After
the Cease-Fire
28. In the first hours of the aerial and missile bombardment, the United States
destroyed most military communications and began the systematic killing of Iraqi soldiers
who were incapable of defence or escape, and the destruction of military equipment. The
U.S. bombing campaign killed tens of thousands of defenceless soldiers, cut off from most
of their food, water and other supplies, and left them in desperate and helpless disarray.
Defendant Schwarzkopf placed Iraqi military casualties at over 100,000. Large numbers of
these soldiers were "out of combat" and therefore not legitimate targets for
military attack.
29. When it was determined that the civilian economy and the military were sufficiently
destroyed, the U.S. ground forces moved into Kuwait and Iraq attacking disorientated,
disorganised, fleeing Iraqi forces wherever they could be found, killing thousands more
and destroying any equipment found. In one particularly shocking manoeuvre, thousands of
Iraqi soldiers were needlessly and illegally buried alive. This wholesale slaughter of
Iraqi soldiers continued even after and in violation of the so-called cease-fire.
30. The Defendants' intention was not to remove Iraq's presence from Kuwait. Rather,
their intention was to destroy Iraq. The disproportion in death and destruction inflicted
on a defenceless enemy exceeded 100 to one. The Defendants conducted this genocidal war
against the Male Population of Iraq for the express purpose of making sure that Iraq could
not raise a substantial military force for at least another generation.
The United States Used Prohibited Weapons
Capable of Mass Destruction and Inflicting Indiscriminate Death and Unnecessary Suffering
Against Both Military and Civilian Targets
31. Fuel air explosives were used against troops in place, civilian areas, oil fields
and fleeing civilians and soldiers on two stretches of highway between Kuwait and Iraq.
One seven mile stretch called the "Highway of Death" was littered with hundreds
of vehicles and thousands of dead. All were fleeing to Iraq for their lives. Thousands
were civilians of all ages, including Kuwaitis, Iraqis, Palestinians, Jordanians and other
nationalities.
32. Napalm was used against civilians and military personnel, as well as to start
fires. Oil well fires in both Iraq and Kuwait were intentionally started by U.S. aircraft
dropping napalm and other heat intensive devices.
33. Cluster bombs and anti-personnel fragmentation bombs were used in Basra, and other
cities and towns, against the civilian convoys of fleeing vehicles and against military
units.
34. "Superbombs" were dropped on hardened shelters with the intention of
assassinating Iraqi President Saddam Hussein - a war crime in its own right.
The United States Intentionally Attacked
Installations in Iraq Containing Dangerous Substances and Forces in Violation of Article
56 of Geneva Protocol I of 1977
35. The U.S. intentionally bombed alleged nuclear sites, chemical plants, dams and
other dangerous forces. The U.S. knew such attacks could cause the release of dangerous
forces from such installations and consequently severe losses among the civilian
population. While some civilians were killed in such attacks, there are no reported cases
of consequent severe losses. Presumably, lethal nuclear materials, and dangerous chemical
and biological warfare substances, were not present at the sites bombed.
The United States Waged War on the
Environment
36. Before the war started, the Pentagon had developed computer models that accurately
predicted the environmental catastrophe that would occur should the United States go to
war against Iraq. These Defendants went to war anyway knowing full well what the
consequences of such an environmental disaster would be. Attacks by U.S. aircraft caused
much if not all of the worst oil spills in the Gulf. Aircraft and helicopters dropped
napalm and fuel-air explosives on oil wells throughout Iraq and many, if not most, of the
oil well fires in Iraq and Kuwait.
Defendant Bush Encouraged and Aided
Shiite Muslims and Kurds to Rebel Against the Government of Iraq Causing Fratricidal
Violence, Emigration, Exposure, Hunger and Sickness and Thousands of Deaths. After the
Rebellion Failed, the U.S. Invaded and Occupied Parts of Iraq Without Lawful Authority in
Order to Increase Division and Hostilities Within Iraq
37. Without authority from the U.S. Congress or the United Nations, Defendant Bush
encouraged and aided rebellion against Iraq, failed to protect the warring parties,
encouraged mass migration of whole populations placing them in jeopardy from the elements,
hunger and disease. After much suffering and many deaths, Defendant Bush then without
authority used U.S. military forces to distribute aid at and near the Turkish border,
ignoring the often greater suffering among refugees in Iran. He then arbitrarily set up
bantu-like settlements for Kurds in Iraq and demanded for Iraq to pay for U.S. costs. When
Kurds chose to return to their homes in Iraq, he moved U.S. troops further into northern
Iraq against the will of the government and without any legal authority to do so. As
Defendant Baker correctly put it when he visited the area, these atrocities constituted a
Nuremberg "crime against humanity."
Defendant Bush Intentionally Deprived the
Iraqi People of Essential Medicines, Potable Water, Food and Other Necessities
38. A major component of the assault on Iraq was the systematic deprivation of
essential human needs and services, to terrorise and break the will of the Iraqi People,
to destroy their economic capability, and to reduce their numbers and weaken their health.
Towards those ends, the Defendants:
- imposed and enforced embargoes preventing the shipment of needed medicines, water
purifiers, infant milk formula, food and other supplies; As a direct result of these cruel and inhuman acts, thousands of people died, many more
suffered illnesses and permanent injury. For these actions, the Defendants are guilty of
Nuremberg Crimes Against Humanity and the Crime of Genocide as recognised by international
law and U.S. domestic law.
Defendant Bush, Having Destroyed Iraq's
Economic Base, Demands Reparations Which Will Permanently Impoverish Iraq and Threaten Its
People with Famine and Epidemic
39. Defendant Bush seeks to force Iraq to pay for damages to Kuwait largely caused by
the U.S. and even to pay U.S. costs for its violation of Iraqi sovereignty in occupying
northern Iraq to further manipulate the Kurdish population there. Such reparations are
neo-colonial means of expropriating Iraq's oil, natural resources, and human labour.
Meanwhile, the United States government dominates and controls the respective governments
and oil resources of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, and
Qatar.
40. The United States government has successfully carried out its long-standing threat
and war plan to seize and steal the oil resources of the Persian Gulf for its own benefit.
The United States now directly controls the natural energy resources that fuel the
economies of Europe and Japan. Acting with their de facto allies in Israel and Great
Britain, the Defendants are today consolidating their control over the entire Middle East
in a blatant bid to establish worldwide hegemony.
Bush's "New World Order"
41. Today, the government in the United States of America constitutes an international
criminal conspiracy under the Nuremberg Charter, Judgment and Principles, that is legally
identical to the Nazi government in World War II Germany. The Defendants' wanton
extermination of approximately 250,000 People in Iraq provides definite proof of the
validity of this Nuremberg Proposition for the entire world to see. Indeed, Defendant
Bush's so-called New World Order sounds and looks strikingly similar to the New Order
proclaimed by Adolph Hitler over fifty years ago. You do not build a real New World Order
with stealth bombers, Abrams tanks, and tomahawk cruise missiles. For their own good and
the good of all humanity, the American People must condemn and repudiate Defendant Bush
and his grotesque vision of a New World Order that is constructed upon warfare, bloodshed,
violence and criminality.
Impeachment
42. All of these aforementioned international crimes constitute "High Crimes and
Misdemeanors" as defined by the Article 2, Section 4 of the United States
Constitution and therefore warrant the impeachment, conviction, and removal from office of
Defendants Bush, Quayle, Baker, Cheney, Powell, and Scowcroft. In regard to this matter,
Congressman Henry Gonzalez of Texas has already introduced an Impeachment Resolution into
the House of Representatives, that is numbered House Resolution 86, calling for the
impeachment and removal from office of these Defendants because they have committed these
international crimes and also because they have subverted and perverted constitutional
government in America "to the manifest injury of the people of the United
States."
A Special Prosecutor
43. These Defendants must be impeached by the House, tried and convicted by the Senate,
and removed from office. Thereafter, we believe that the Commission of Inquiry and the
International War Crimes Tribunal will have produced sufficient evidence to trigger the
application of the Ethics in Government Act, 28 U.S.C. 591 et seq., that would lead to the
appointment of an Independent Counsel (i.e., Special Prosecutor) to investigate and
prosecute these high-ranking officials for the wholesale violation of federal criminal
laws in their decision to launch and wage this criminal war against the People and State
of Iraq. We fully intend to see Bush, Baker, Cheney, Quayle, Scowcroft, Webster, Powell,
Schwarzkopf and the rest of the U.S. High Command sitting in jail for the rest of their
natural lives.
44. Make no mistake about it: The very nature, future and existence of the American
Republic depends upon the success of these endeavours. Today, the battle begins for the
hearts and minds of the American People between the Warmongers and the Peacemakers. We ask
all of you to join us in this legal campaign and moral crusade to restore to the United
States of America a democratic government with a commitment to the Rule of Law and the
Constitution both at home and abroad.
Introduction
- froze funds of Iraq and forced other nations to do so, depriving Iraq of the ability to
purchase needed medicines, food and other supplies;
- preventing international organisations, governments and relief agencies from providing
needed supplies and obtaining information concerning such needs;
- failed to assist or meet urgent needs of huge refugee populations and interfered with
efforts of others to do so, etc.
© 1992 by Francis Boyle