[allAfrica.com] [allAfrica.com_Top_Headlines] Review the Disarmament Guidelines The Analyst (Monrovia) EDITORIAL May 19, 2004 Posted to the web May 19, 2004 Monrovia IN OUR BANNER story titled "MADNESS" we reported that a mob of ex-fighters belonging to the former Government of Liberia (GOL) blocked the main route between Paynesville and Congo Town, looted goods belonging to marketers and shop owners, threw stones, and snatched cell phones, wrist watches, and other valuables from innocent passers-by. The mob action that disrupted the quietude of the Monrovia suburb of Paynesville and ELWA and left one person dead is the result of attempts by the ex-fighters to remind the UNMIL authorities of the arrears that have been pending since December last year. UNMIL AUTHORITIES CLAIM the mob action referred to above was the result of impatience and unruly behavior on the part of the ex-fighters. According to them, the ex-fighter refused to wait for their time and abruptly turned out at the 72nd Military Barracks, demanding to be transported to the cantonment site in VOA. But the ex-fighters are saying something else. They are saying that they should receive their arrears before the process continues with those who have been disarmed and that the current procedure was intended to rob them of their arrears. SIMILAR SITUATION OCCURRED last December when the same GOL ex-fighters reportedly refused to follow the timetable for disarmament and instead demanded the compensation for the weapons they turned in. As the result of that misunderstanding between UNMIL and the ex-fighters, five persons were killed, and thousands of United States dollars worth of properties were either carted away or damaged. No doubt this is unfortunate. WHILE IS TRUE that the ex-fighters acted unruly, and unfortunately so, we think there is a serious problem with the implementation of the DDRR procedures. For instance, we don't understand why misunderstanding continues to exist between UNMIL and the ex-fights on the same issue of compensation when the nation was made to understand on April 13, 2004 that there were enough resources to start and keep the DDRR programme going to its eventual end. It baffles us also that there should be a problem arising from procedure interpretation when UNMIL has at its disposal a huge propaganda machinery that runs twenty-four hours a day. In our view, the fact that the confusion between UNMIL and the ex-fighters is over the same issue points to two possibilities: either the fighters are not getting the information or the procedures are convoluted and therefore not working. There is something wrong here that must be corrected and corrected immediately. THIS IS NECESSARY and must take absolute priority if the DDRR programme proceed smoothly. Not is it necessary for the process, but it is also mandatory because the population cannot continue endure the danger of encountering rowdy mobs every four to five months because a group fails to follow a procedure laid down for them or because some bureaucrats refused to acknowledge the failure of a system of procedures they have put in place. It must be remembered that each time there is this misunderstanding, innocent people lose their lives. Not only that, the property of poverty stricken Liberians taken away by hooligans without compensation. This is happening under the glare of the largest yet peace-keeping mission in Africa is baffling. BY NOW THE issue of financial compensation in the DDRR process should by now be considered cardinal to the success of the process, for, to think otherwise is to live in outer space or in another world. There is no more time to brush it aside unless somebody somewhere wants to drag the process for his own benefit while the population continues to suffer and die. We think the decision to withhold the compensation of the GOL ex-fighters who had already disarmed until new entrants are processed is not working and should therefore be reviewed. THE PEOPLE ARE tired of running and dying because of procedures that though make a lot of sense on paper but that are not working in the fields. The disarmament process must therefore be reviewed in light of the continued compensation-related violence in the country, mainly the nation's capital that has the largest concentration of UNMIL troops.   =============================================================================   Copyright © 2004 The Analyst. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). =============================================================================