News  

Hajj Mabrur 1425  

On the Path of Return  

Helping Disaster Victims  

The World in Pictures  

Family  

Art & Culture

Health & Science

Hijab Campaign

Volunteers-Youth Network

Blood Donation Campaign

Special Pages & Folders

Muslim Affairs

Views & Analyses

Iraq in Transition

Palestine in Focus

Darfur

Discover Islam

Introducing Islam

Ask about Islam

Contemporary Issues

My Journey to Islam

Shari`ah Corner

Ask the Scholar

Live Fatwa

Fatwa Bank

Hajj & `Umrah

Qur'an: The 
Reminder

Hadith & Sunnah

Muhammad: The Man & Message

Islamic Audio

Religious Files

Counseling

Parenting Counselor

Cyber Counselor

Directories

Site Directory

Islamic Society

Islamic Banks

TV Channels

Telephone Code

Services

Prayer Times

Matrimonial

Date Converter

Calendar

Discussion Forum

Live Dialogue

Address Book

E-Cards

Newsletter

Enter your E-mail

People Have Final Say on Unarmed Intifada: Experts

“It is very likely that the voters will reconsider their position if the platform of their candidate fails to live up to their expectations,” said Faris.

By Samer Khuwayera, IOL Correspondent

NABLUS, January 5 (IslamOnline.net) – The Palestinian people should have the final say on whether to de-militarize the second Palestinian Intifada, as urged by presidential frontrunner Mahmoud Abbas, according to Palestinian experts and officials Wednesday, January 5.

They agreed that resorting to the armed Intifada or sitting down to the negotiating table, or juggling between both, were governed by the circumstances of every juncture of the Palestinian struggle for an independent state.

Minister of State Kadoura Faris said no body could tailor a particular pattern for a people living under occupation.

“The Palestinian Authority and all resistance and political factions should let the lay people to have their say on their next leader and his agenda to end the occupation,” Faris told IslamOnline.net.

But he reinforced that there would be no “absolute mandate” from the people for any particular leader.

“It is very likely that the voters will reconsider their position if the platform of their candidate fails to live up to their expectations. They might go to the streets and demand the resignation of the next president and the holding of new election.”

Abbas angered Palestinian factions last month when he renewed calls for “demilitarizing” the Intifada and criticized the rocket attacks on the Israeli settlements as counterproductive.

The Palestinian presidential election — the first to be held since 1996 — is to take place on January 9 in the occupied territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

With seven candidates vying, Palestinian voters will elect a new chairman of the Palestinian Authority to replace their emblematic leader Yasser Arafat, who dramatically passed away on November 11, 2004.

The popular resistance movement Hamas said on December 22 it would neither support any of the Palestinian presidential hopefuls nor name a candidate, charging the vote has been “tailored” for Abbas.

Unified

“The Intifada remains as a legitimate Palestinian right and I myself oppose condemning it,” said Al-Masri.

Rafik An-Natcha, member of the Legislative Council and former Fatah member, said the Palestinians are not trapped in a vicious circle, predicting they would rather act in unison.

“They definitely rally behind the resistance, though they differ with one another on the timing and the form,” he told IOL.

He opted for giving diplomacy a chance before adopting other alternatives.

Prominent analyst Hani Al-Masri agreed that Palestinians have too much in common and are unified by the occupation.

“The inter-Palestinian dialogue has come along way recently,” Al-Masri said.

But he added the Palestinian people became “exhausted” after four years of Intifada and need to “relax,” noting that adhering to resistance as the one and only solution was not a “positive thing.”

“In fact this serves Fatah’s agenda, but needless to say that the Palestinians are forced to defend themselves and resist the aggressive Israeli policies.

“But Intifada remains as a legitimate Palestinian right and I myself oppose condemning it.”

Mohammad Ghazal, a leading Hamas member, said that the Palestinian resistance movement should have a card up to its sleeve when dealing with the Israeli occupation.

“It is not a matter of choosing between resistance or negotiations,” he said. “Resistance is not all about arms but has many facets, including politics.”

Palestinian pundits have said that the second Palestinian Intifada has left its indelible marks compared to the 1987 Intifada (first one) against the Israeli occupation.

Following the killing of four Palestinian workers at the hands of Israeli settlers, the Palestinians launched their first seven-year Intifada (Stone Intifada) against the occupation forces.

And in September 2000, Al-Aqsa Intifada erupted in the wake of the provocative visit of the then Israeli opposition leader Ariel Sharon to Al-Aqsa mosque, Islam’s third holiest site.

Back To News Page


Please feel free to contact News editor at:
Englishnews@islam-online.net


Advanced Search

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   

Related Links


In the Site:


CONTACT US  | GUEST BOOK  | SITE MAP


Best viewed by:
MS Internet Explorer 4.0
and above.

Copyright © 1999-2004 Islam Online
All rights reserved

Disclaimer

Partially Developed by:
Afkar Information Technology