Among
the Russian journalists servicing the authorities there is a
considerable stratum of 'scribbling scribblers', who can be called
'vindicators'. They are easy to recognize. As
soon as some events happen when the authorities end up looking stupid,
a whole pack of such 'vindicators', -- under the guise of reporting, --
starts suggesting to the population the version, which the authorities
will benefit from.
This
is what it usually sounds like: «Well, a KGB agent just can’t slip up
and fall into a pile of manure; it can only be a maneuver to disguise a
special operation».
You
don’t believe it? Read the latest exclusive interviews with anonymous
KGB veterans (usually their names remain undisclosed). They
are giving interviews exclusively out of respect to the readers of some
particular periodicals, such as MK ('Moskovsky Komsomolets' – «
After
being in a temporary state of shock, just like their masters were
during the events in Beslan, North Ossetia, the vindicators proceeded
with their routine job the next day.
What
should the population be told this time? That no storm was planned,
that Putin did not sleep all of these days and nights and was worrying
about the children to be rescued; that terrorists were out of their
mind and were the first to open fire, which caused the tragic end.
Russian
propagandists are experts at making stories. Each journalist has is own
hostage who was set free and who now gives detailed interviews about
the events. Doesn’t it sound strange, while the authorities are taking
the phones away even from doctors at the hospitals? Even the doctors
are not allowed any contacts with the outside world and relatives are
not allowed to see the survived hostages.
But
whichever Russian newspaper you open up, each one of them has a hostage
'saved by a miracle' who tells about 'how it really happened', and at
the same time he knows it like he participated in negotiations or at
least his knowledge is at the level of an expert of mines and
explosives.
The
mission is clear and the methods are obvious to anyone. The main
question is who was the author of the first disastrous blast, which
served as the beginning of the tragic end? They are trying to tell us
that a bomb went off in the gym, where the hostages were, or at the
entrance, from where dead bodies of hostages were allegedly being
taken, as it was agreed with the terrorists, and the terrorists were
allegedly the ones who accidentally got blown up on their own tripwire
mine. But since the dead bodies were thrown out of the window before
that, then there was no entrance in that area, and the bodies only had
to be picked up under the window. There could not be any tripwires in
that area either, since the terrorists could not drop the dead bodies
from the second floor right on their own mines and tripwires.
Let’s
say this was not so and everything happened according to the official
version, i.e. instead of observing how dead bodies were being taken,
the terrorists came outside to greet the Emergency Ministry workers and
got blown up on their own tripwires. Then what about the reports of
Russian and foreign sources that the gym’s wall was blown up by Russian
special forces in order to evacuate the hostages from the school when
everything started?
How
can you possibly blow up a wall, and what kind of an explosive is it
supposed to be to make a hole in the wall enough for a crowd of people
to pass through, -- and so that nobody inside gets hurt!? How did the
ones who blew up the wall figure out that no other explosive devices
set up inside would go off, since they knew for sure (whoever it was)
that the building was mined and that the school was packed with
hostages?
Finally,
how did the group of the 'demolition men' end up at the wall from the
outside, while according to the official version, the storm was not
planned, but only forces of the Emergencies Ministry were removing the
dead bodies?
The
answer to all of these questions is obvious. The storm was planned from
the very beginning and was carried out on Putin’s order. The ones who
were storming the school were not worried about the lives of the
hostages, and judging by the blast of the building from the outside, it
looks like they were trying to increase the number of victims as much
as they could, and they made it.
No
one knows who these terrorists were. Even if they were Chechens
(although it was already proved that there were no Chechens there),
then this is the way they were just responding to the Russian terror by
using terror. But
one thing you can say for sure: however much they would be called
'inhumane', they turned out to be more humane than Putin is, -- even
because they were mistaken when they underestimated the
bloodthirstiness of the Kremlin’s vampire and because they hoped that
he would not go for killing children.
Salman Daudov,