The
bloodbath unleashed by Musharraf's forces at the Lal Masjid (Red
Mosque) in Islamabad has shown just how far he is prepared to
go to achieve his aims. Amidst claim and counter claim from the
regime in the aftermath of 'Operation Silence', it is beginning to
emerge that hundreds, including women and children, may have been
killed in the bloody assault. It is rumoured that Musharraf himself
rejected a possible deal
at the last moment that could have led to a peaceful
outcome and instead ordered the assault. What is known is that
Abdul Rashid Ghazi, one of the two brothers who led the Red Mosque,
were killed.
It is well known that the Red Mosque had extensive links with elements
of the establishment. ISI officials have in the past been
closely connected with the seminary, links that were forged during
the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. The question that arises is
how has it been possible for the Mosque students to go virtually
unchallenged in the last 6 months on the streets of Islamabad? In
their self styled campaign they targeted alleged prostitutes
and music shops. Yet the obvious question is how has this been
possible right under the noses of Musharraf's regime, an
area where the National Assembly, Supreme Court and Musharraf's
Presidential Palace itself is closely situated nearby? How
were these students in the Red Mosque allowed to build up such an
alleged large arsenal of weapons without been detected?
Musharraf has tried to justify the operation by saying that
he wanted a peaceful outcome and avoid large-scale casualties,
particularly with such a large number of women and children being
involved. However his real intention was made evident when on 29th June he said to journalists "Can you guarantee that blood of any dead or injured will not be screened on television channels during the operation?"
If the regime really wanted a peaceful outcome all it had to do was
wait after cutting off all gas, electricity and food supplies to the
compound. The recent past shows that Musharraf has always used military
force in such situations where he has been confronted by
opponents, whether Islamic or Nationalistic. The lessons of Nawab Akbar Bugti,
the Balochi rebels and the operations in the tribal areas of
Waziristan show this to be true. Indeed in the past Musharraf has
unashamedly said, "If
someone happens to be very close to [the target], that somebody is an
abetter and they suffer the loss. Sometimes, indeed, women and children
have been killed but they have been right next to the place. It's not
that the strike was inaccurate but they happen to be there, so
therefore they are all supporters and abetters of terrorism - and
therefore they have to suffer. It's bad luck."
The regime repeatedly alleged that there were 'hundreds'
of fighters including suicide bombers inside as well being heavily
armed with all sorts of light weaponry. Independent observes though
estimated that at least over a thousand students were still inside the
Red Mosque compound at the time of the assault, mostly women and
children. Musharraf further alleged that highly wanted foreign
terrorists were amongst the students. But by the regime's own
admission only about 80 alleged fighters
have been killed. It remains unclear how many women and children were
rescued, if at all. No bodies have been produced thus far to
substantiate the claim that foreign fighters were indeed amongst the
dead. Moreover only 11 Pakistani commandos died in the operation.
How could this be possible
if the militants were so heavily armed and prepared for suicide
bombings? Ghazi claimed in his final phone interview they only had 14
AK-47s to defend themselves. If Musharraf's claims were true
there should have been many more deaths amongst his troops.
The other possible part of the explanation of why casualties were so
low amongst the security forces is that they indiscriminately attacked
everyone inside the Red Mosque to minimise their own losses. With the
world's media gazing on, an air strike would have been political
suicide. They had to be seen to be trying to save lives. Prime Minister
Shaukat Aziz claimed
that not a single woman or child died but as details emerge reports
suggest otherwise. Indeed there are reports of mass graves being dug to
quickly bury the dead with hundreds of students including women and
children being killed with many more unaccounted for. With the media being denied access
to the Mosque in the aftermath no one can believe the carefully
choreographed footage shown on state television by a regime which has
every motive to hide the number killed. The only question that remains
is why Musharraf chose to wait so long whilst a surreal situation
developed on the streets of Islamabad.
One can begin to see why and the real motives at play when one
evaluates the wider picture for Musharraf's actions. The whole
issue began when Musharraf's regime demolished six mosques it
claimed were built illegally on government land prompting girls from
the adjoined Jamia Hafsa to occupy a library at the beginning of this
year. It is not hard to see how the regime easily goaded the Red
Mosque. Musharraf needed a distraction as the political
opposition continued to build momentum opposing his bid to be
re-elected to the Presidency using the current National and
Provincial assemblies as expected later this year. Musharraf is
desperate to hang on to both the Presidency and the Chief of
Army Staff post, his real source of power. Rather than taking
the risk of relying upon new assemblies, Musharraf seeks a
new 5-year term rubber stamped by the current assemblies.
The opposition snowballed with Musharraf's clumsy attempted dismissal
of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Iftikhar Chaudary, who
he tried to remove unceremoniously so that a more pliant
lackey would negate any legal challenges to his re-election. Chaudary's
unprecedented opposition
to Musharraf has created a crisis, which has sent him reeling. In
recent months the opposition has cleverly exploited the issue built
around Chaudary, which has seen thousands taking to the streets of
Pakistan, all opposed to Musharraf. This culminated with the
pro-Musharraf MQM clashing with opposition supporters on the streets of
Karachi on May 12th 2007 where Chaudary was due to address a rally.
Dozens of people were shot dead and many more injured. With Geo and Aaj Television studios also being attacked, Musharraf
has tried to intimidate and silence the media from reporting on recent
events. It is no coincidence that he deployed 12,000 security personnel
around Islamabad, a grotesque overkill designed in reality to prevent
any kind of political protests.
In the next few weeks the Supreme Court is due to rule on the suspension of the Chief Justice, which has thrown out evidence from Musharraf's lawyers. Together with this backdrop and his regime's abysmal response
to the recent Balochistan floods, Musharraf is under severe pressure to
do something to save his skin, which he literally described as his army
uniform. This pressure was further amplified with the
political opposition massing in London for an 'All Parties Conference' (APC) in which all the major opposition leaders from 38 parties attended, apart from Benazir Bhutto, who sent her deputy Makhdoom Amin Fahim instead for the PPP.
Musharraf has always sought to divide the opposition. It was no small
achievement to see so many disparate groups come together. The APC
agreed that if Musharraf tries to have himself re-elected before
holding new elections they would all resign on masse from the Senate
and Assemblies. All agreed apart from Bhutto's PPP, which said it will
consider it's position at such a time. With the attack on the Red
Mosque Musharraf has clearly hoped it will help break the momentum of
the opposition, divert attention away from the APC and reinvigorate his
position in the West as ‘bulwark' against ‘Islamic Extremism'.
Musharraf's objective is clear; he wants to hold on to power at any
cost.
This is not the only pressure Musharraf is facing. The recent book by Dr Ayesha Siddiqa, Military Inc, has
only brought more scrutiny on the actions of his regime. The
book revealed how the top tier of Musharraf's handpicked officers
are more busy making money in business enterprises and
sinecures rather then focusing on defending the country.
Where Musharraf has deployed his troops, it has been to placate his
western masters. Musharraf has deployed more than 80,000
Pakistani troops in the tribal areas to aid America's 'War on Terror'.
Musharraf's chosen course has serious implications for Pakistan and
marks a watershed in his dictatorship. His operations in Waziristan and
Balochistan before were relatively out of sight; the Red Mosque attack
was covered live on TV. Musharraf has clearly signalled that he is
ready to spill blood and wants everyone in Pakistan, his opponents in
particular, to understand this. Whether this intent is a bluff or not,
Musharraf actions are only likely to provide him short-term relief. As
in the case of the Chief Justice, many Pakistanis will see thorough
Musharraf's scheming as the true picture emerges behind the Red Mosque
massacre. Many will be understandably distraught throughout the country
including the NWFP and the tribal heartlands. Inevitably there can only
be more bloodshed in Pakistan, as some will choose violence to
retaliate.
Musharraf's myopic policies, not withstanding their heinous nature,
have set the scene for a violent backlash, raising the spectre of civil
war. Already nearly 70 Pakistani troops have been killed in a suicide bomb attacks, 24 in one
alone. Whilst many fear these consequences, Musharraf himself may have
concluded this and may actually even be hoping that this is the case.
As opposition to him reaches unprecedented levels, further violence
creates the perfect pretext to postpone elections indefinitely by
declaring a state of emergency, effectively martial law. At a stroke
Musharraf will have secured his power.
However such a strategy is flawed. This will no doubt tempt Musharraf.
But his western backers are more realistic and understand that their
‘man' may not last much longer. The Carnegie Endowment for International for Peace, an American think tank, has argued
for all kinds of pressure to be applied on Musharraf to ditch his
position of Army Chief. This is why the West has supported Musharraf's secret negotiations
with Bhutto, perhaps the worst kept secret in Pakistan. A deal with
Bhutto they believe will allow Musharraf to dump the religious parties
of the MMA he has relied upon and use the PPP to lend a veneer of
acceptable secular legitimacy to Musharraf's dictatorship. But a deal
with Bhutto would not be without cost as inevitably she would seek to
increase her own power at the expense of Musharraf's, in return for her
party's support. More importantly Bhutto would hold little currency
with many Pakistanis because of her past corrupt rule, such is her
discredited character. Musharraf is damned whatever path he chooses.
But beyond Musharraf himself there are potentially graver perils on the
horizon as he has opened a Pandora's box. A serious situation is
developing in the northern area of Swat as Musharraf has dispatched
another 10-20,000 troops to confront pro-Taliban forces. Just before
the Red Mosque raid it is reported that Musharraf had agreed to give America
and NATO permission to attack any target inside Pakistan itself. This
Red Mosque raid may now provide a further pretext for such an
eventuality and in fact may be the raison d'etre.
NATO and American forces have struggled to contain
the Pushtun led rebellion to their occupation of Afghanistan,
which has only multiplied. American and NATO forces have been itching
to bomb the tribal regions of Pakistan who they accuse of aiding
their ethnic and tribal brethren in Afghanistan. Whilst Musharraf's
Generals are occupied with crony capitalism, their
cowardness has been exposed by the utter subservience
to America and the West. Just two weeks before the Red Mosque
siege climax NATO forces shelled and injured 6 Pakistani troops
amongst others. Musharraf has shown that he is unwilling to
stand up for his own people when needed but is more than
ready to spill their blood at the behest of his masters in
Washington.
America's discomfort over the Afghanistan resistance has been
exasperated by the ‘peace' deals Musharraf's regime signed with rebels
in Waziristan nearly two years ago. These deals have
been repeatedly denounced by western politicians as a sign of Musharraf
being soft in the ‘War on Terror'. Musharraf, under pressure from
within the Pakistan army, had good reason to sign these deals because
the army was suffering heavy losses at the time; more than 700 soldiers
had been killed. As predictable, the rebels in Waziristan have now announced
in the aftermath of the Red Mosque raid that these deals no longer
exist. Musharraf it seems has orchestrated this whole Red Mosque drama
under pressure from Washington. Days before the Red Mosque raid a story
in the New York Times
claimed a large American operation to target the tribal regions in
Waziristan was aborted in 2005 because Musharraf would not agree to it
due to the inevitable domestic political fallout. It's almost certain
that America must have known in advance the Red Mosque raid would take
place. The message is clear, such ‘weakness' on the part of Musharraf
is no longer acceptable and is designed to pave the way forward.
Musharraf may now claim that NATO and American forces are needed to
fight ‘Islamic extremists' and justify their entry into Pakistan.
Whilst America may bomb at will,
the old enemy India will be relishing events unfolding inside Pakistan.
The militant groups, which have been such a thorn for India since the
1990s, will now be pitted against their previous masters, the Pakistan
army. Never since the crisis of 1971, which led to East Pakistan
breaking away to form Bangladesh, has Pakistan faced a graver crisis.
Internally weakened Pakistan's very integrity now lies at stake.
The West has once again proven it's hypocrisy by backing a brutal
dictator for it's interests. Even after the wanton spilling of so much
blood they have been full of nothing but praise for their man. In
Musharraf's case he is integral to the occupation of Afghanistan, the
gateway to the oil and gas riches of Central Asia. With Pakistan being
strategically located, it has become ever more important to deal with
China and a resurgent Russia that are increasingly coordinating their
opposition to the West.
The tragedy is that Pakistan is indispensable for America in her war in
Afghanistan. That is why America continues to shower all kinds of aid
upon Musharraf and his regime. America has given $10 billion since September 2001. Just before the Red Mosque assault, in a bid to shore up their agent, America handed over two F-16s flown in personally by a US Air force General. Emboldened by the carnage at the Red Mosque Musharraf declared t that "Extremism and terrorism will be defeated in every corner of the country".
The Red Mosque episode will go down as a decisive moment in Pakistan's turbulent history. As British military chiefs
fear ‘regime change', there can only be two paths for Pakistan now;
gradual disintegration or honour with the restoration of the Khilafah.
In the past Musharraf has abandoned the Muslims of Afghanistan,
implicated and humiliated Dr A.Q Khan in alleged nuclear proliferation,
abandoned Pakistan's traditional position on Kashmir and voiced strong
support for the recognition of Israel. Now he is turning Pakistan's
army against it own people. Musharraf is the very opposite of what
ordinary Pakistanis stand for. Musharraf has shown that he has truly
joined the ranks of great tyrants, like Uzbekistan's Islam Karimov and
the atrocity in Andijan in 2005, with his brutal Red Mosque massacre.
But Allah (SWT) is watcher over all things and surely Musharraf will
face his reckoning on the Day of Judgment when he meets his creator.
For as Allah (SWT) says in the Quran:
"On the Day when every soul will find itself confronted
with all that it hath done of good and all that it hath done of evil
(every soul) will long that there might be a mighty space of distance
between it and that (evil)."
[Surah Al-Imran 3:30]
Comments
|