Afghanistan

An option for the Taliban

1999

At the occasion of crucial talks between Taliban and their rival Northern Alliance, due to begin tomorrow in Ashgabad, foreign demands for a broad-based government in Afghanistan sound quite fair at the surface. However, reality of and motives behind transmitting different proposals and sending "fact-finding missions" in this regard are far deeper and sinister than we can comprehend from the sympathetic calls for it.

Every party that has a finger in the pie has a different version of broad-base government in its mind. The American idea of a brand broad-based government in particular means establishment of Taliban and Ikhwan-less government in Kabul to permanently weaken the basis for the establishment of a "fundamentalist" regime in the region. To understand the idea behind all such glittering proposals, it is of paramount importance to look into the evolving situation in the context of what has happened in the not too distant past.

According to the US grand plan the Communists were defeated through Mujahideen with active assistance of the Islamic governments. They were then left alone against the government of Najib Ullah. Finally, when Mujahideen came to power, the US bought over some of their military commanders and paid them millions of dollars. These sell-out Mujahideen commanders grew too big for their shoes and they started establishing mini-governments in almost every village and street of Afghanistan. They erected numerous check-post on the highways and around every corner of the areas under their control. There were countless checkpoints and hundreds of commanders in the lawless land of Afghanistan. Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani was the president but he couldn't even live in his Arg (Palace) due to rival governments in the opposite streets to his Arg. He used to live in Kher Khana (North of Kabul City), close to Ahmad Shah Masood forces for security.

Mujahideen commanders, who rebelled against their party leadership, started looting and plundering the already deprived and impoverished Afghan population. According to reliable Afghan sources, homosexuality among them was rampant. The morally corrupt commanders went to the extreme of marrying young boys -- in some cases by force. They were literally breaking into homes for robbery and rape. If the inmates shot them in self-defence during the night, the commanders used to raise their homes to the ground in the next few days. People got fed up of these commanders who were no longer in control of their respective party leaders. Instead, they started blackmailing their party leaders by threatening to switch loyalties and joining the opposition groups.

Osama bin Laden was residing in Afghanistan since 1979. Human rights violations, drug trade, theft, robberies and every evil was prevalent in the state. Still, the government was acceptable to the US and UN because the commanders were sell outs, betraying their nation and following the US diktates, which even the US didn't know what it wanted from them. There was no Lakhdar Brahimi to condemn "human rights abuses" and demand for a "broad-based government" in Afghanistan. Communists had joined hands with Rabbani officials and the US was interested in bringing other liberal minded elements into the leadership fold.

The US intelligence was keeping the US abreast of the growing public unrest and uneasiness in Afghanistan. When people got completely fed-up, the US offered to normalise the situation by bringing Zahir Shah back into power. Besides, it forced Pakistani government to close down Taliban schools and expel them from Pakistan. The plan was to put Taliban and Mujahideen into an unending conflict with each other to substantially reduce them in numbers and weaken their potential for establishing a fundamentalist government in Kabul.

The situation was ripe for Taliban's CIA-and-ISI-sponsored intervention. The suffering Afghans were looking forward to a savior and arrival of Taliban was no less than a miracle for them. Naseer Ullah Baber clearly stated that Pakistan has politically, militarily and economically supported Taliban. Sympathizers of Taliban were of the view that this way the American purpose would be served and Uncle Sam would be pleased with Pakistan's services. Taliban started their struggle with a twelve member core committee (only five of them are alive today) and the rest of the people, mostly the Pakhtoon community, stood by them against Mujahideen commanders' barbarity and boorishness.

Taliban's unexpected success and their establishment of Sharia took everyone in Washington and Islamabad by surprise. If Mujahideen were fundamentalist, Taliban proved to be the super-fundamentalist. Looking at the horrible death of Najeeb Ullah and company, both communists and Mujahideen left the way open for Taliban. The US wanted Taliban to check Mujahideen's "fundamentalism" and get them engaged in a long unending violence against each other. Taliban were no way meant to take over Kabul and bring peace the way they did through collection of all weapons from friends and foes alike and diminish any chance of a renewed violence.

Now, the thought-mills in Washington went into ceaseless struggle and started to grind out some new mischief for checking Taliban, whose government could become a "menace of fundamentalism" for the rest of the Islamic countries. Apart from the regular anti-Taliban propaganda, a conspiracy was hatched whereby General Malik invited Taliban to Mazar Sharif for complete and unconditional surrender to Taliban. Core committee of Taliban was also invited. Moulvi Ihsan Ullah Ihsan - the most educated and much dreaded leader of Taliban -- was one of them. Services of Afghan foreign minister, Mulla Mohammed Ghous - presently engaged in potato business at Quetta -- were specially utilised to bring Moulvi Ihsan Ullah Ihsan to Mazar Sharif along with other Taliban.

Taliban were not expecting to be attacked by Gen. Malik forces. They were tricked, trapped, tied and indiscriminately killed on their arrival to Mazar Sharif by General Malik and his forces with the active assistance of Hazara minority. A total of 8,520 Taliban died, who were later buried in mass graves. Moulvi Ihsan Ullah Ihsan was taken to the grave of Shiite leader from Hizb-e-Wahdat, Abdul Ali Mazari, and slaughtered there. General Malik is now sitting in the US enjoying Uncle Sam's gifts and benedictions for his valuable services.

Taliban have captured all the strategic towns in the North, except Panjsher in the Parwan province -- due to direct assistance from Tajikistan, Iran, Turkey, France, Uzbekistan, Israel and Russia. Russia sent 1,200 commandos to Takhar when its Taliban posted governor, Mulla Alamgir, was bought over by the Northern allies. Analysing the relative tranquility and all such developments in Afghanistan, the US has started beating the drum of broad-based government on the one hand and providing Northern allies with 50 million US dollars to capture or kill Osama bin Laden. Uncle Sam wants to bring Zahir Shah's grandson, Mr. Mustafa, from Canada, as the president of liberal democratic Afghanistan. Mr. Mustafa has graduated from Canada. Taliban are of the view that Mustafa, or any member of Zahir Shah family for that matter, can come back only as a citizen of Afghanistan, not as a ruler.

The US insists that Shorra-e-Tafahum (Broad-based government) be comprised of communists, representatives of Afghan Millat, Hizb-e-Wahdat (and other Shiite organisations), Mujahideen, Taliban and other groups. It was acceptable to the US and UN, when there were street by street governments in Afghanistan. However, they are reluctant to accept Taliban's rule, which covers all but two and a half provinces of Afghanistan. There is no corruption under Taliban's rule. No one can steal, rape, or rob. Unlike Pakistan, where one cannot feel safe even at home; one can move from Torkham to Torghundi at Tukaminstan border; from Torghundi to Speen Buldak at Pakistan border near Baluchistan; and from Speen Buldak to Hiratan with a trunk load of cash without any fear of robbery of theft. There is no difference between a common man and a minister who drives his own car and get mingled with general public in the market place and mosques like a common man. Rehabilitation and reconstruction work is in progress in almost every sectors in Afghanistan.

Such a government is not acceptable to the US. However, it was perfectly happy with the government of Rabbani over one TV station and ministry of defence. In the name of broad-based government, the US wants to establish a unique kind of "liberal" government that would not only be anti-Pakistan but anti-Islam as well. To give the present government the legitimacy of broad-baseness, Taliban must have to be tolerant, accommodative and flexible. They must change their approach to running Afghanistan.

Taliban must accommodate other Mujahideen factions to avoid the folly of getting into isolation like the previous rulers in Kabul. Taliban, of course, belong to the same Mujahideen who fought and died for Afghanistan against the Soviet Union. Former Mujahideen leaders are no longer interested in sharing the government with Taliban. Engineer Hikmatyar and Ustad Abdur-rab Rasul Siyaf are not interested in ministerial positions. Sibghat ullah Mujadidi has tasted presidency; he won't like to become a minister. All of them would rather send their representatives. Amir-ul-Momineen Mulla Umer should call leaders of all the factions for negotiation and enter into an agreement on the following or similar terms and conditions:

  • All the parties have to surrender their weapons to the broad-based central government.
  • Taliban would hold portfolio of President and Prime Minister.
  • Except Interior, Foreign and Defence Ministries - that would be controlled by Taliban -- all other ministries should be given to other parties to the broad-based government.
  • Irrespective of their religious and ideological affiliations, allies from the North should get equal representation and share in the ministerial portfolio.
  • Security of life and personal property of all the leaders should be guaranteed.
  • To avoid foreign agents and their mischief, neutral Afghan technocrats should be invited from abroad and appointed on the key positions after thorough screening and scrutiny.
  • The broad-based government should cooperate with the UN and keep it involved in the process of sharing power with communists (leftists), Mujahideen, Shiite, Hizb-e-Islami (Hikmatyar), Hizb-e-Islami (Moulvi Khalis), Harkat-e-Inqilab-e-Islami (Moulvi Mohammad Nabi), Jameet-e-Islami Afghanistan (B. Rabbani), Ithehad-e-Islami (Prof. Abdur Rasul Sayyaf), Gillani, Sibghatullah Mujadidi, Ahmad Shah Masood, technocrats and all others. How can any one in the wide world can have an objection to a government shared by all these?
  • Taliban should avoid Qandaharism and must respect those Mujahideen commanders who sincerely surrendered to the Taliban forces. Otherwise they would face the tragedies of Tagau and Nigrau where Taliban's negative attitude forced the local commanders to let Ahmad Shah Masood forces recapture their provinces.
  • Taliban should remove the impression that they are not honestly seeking to negotiate and merely indulge in manoeuvering.

Taliban are left with the only option to make peace with different factions and legitimise their government; otherwise the kind of broad-based government the US is going to impose on them through six plus two formula would reduce Mujahideen and Taliban status next to nothing. Mustafa would appoint cabinet members according to his own choice. Only the US line-toeing Mujahideen and Taliban would be included so that their government could play a vital role against Iran, China and Russia.

Anti-Pakistan indoctrination was hallmark of Zahir Shah's rule in Kabul. Because of their brought up, most of the Afghan are still of the opinion that Pakistan has played a major role in the destruction and devastation of Afghanistan for its own benefit. Of course, Pakistan has played a major role in the Afghan conflict but that was to the advantage of the Afghan nation. CIA had, and still has, its own motives but we cannot doubt the sacrifices made by the ISI. CIA has a flip-flop policy on Afghanistan that would always tilt in favour of US interests at the cost of Afghan nation. ISI, however, knows very well that Pakistan has no advantage in devastating Afghanistan. It, nevertheless, has every right to support pro-Pakistan groups otherwise they would face the same taunt, in Aimal Kansi prosecutor's words, that Pakistanis can sell their mothers for a few thousand dollars.

In a recent interview to the Iranian TV on 27the January, Ahmad Shah Masood has once again criticised Pakistan as the "enemy," which has "no interest in establishing peace in Afghanistan." If Pakistan were enemy number one of the Afghan people, it would never have extended all kinds of facilities and would rather have made refugees life as miserable as it is in Iran. Under Mustafa, Rabbani or Masood, the same anti-Pakistan feelings and policies would be revived. Pakistan should assist Taliban and other factions to establish a broad-based government according to the aforementioned formula; otherwise there are some elements working to exploit the situation against Pakistan. They are spreading the idea that Pakistan is not interested in permanent peace in Afghanistan, because the Durand Line has already expired in 1993 and Afghanistan has the right to ask for its part up to Attock - just as Hong Kong went back to China. To avoid this eventuality, Pakistan is dragging its feet on a peaceful solution to the Afghan imbroglio.

Such misconceptions can hurt Pakistan particularly if an anti-Pak and pro-US government come to power in Kabul. If the communists - like General Shahnawaz Tarain, living like a guest king in Islamabad - and other so-called liberal minded people come to power as a result of US sponsored negotiations, Pakistan would face some unimaginable problems due to their anti-Pakistan attitude. We have to assist Taliban in forming a government on the above mentioned principles. Ustad Siyyaf and Burhanuddin Rabbani would certainly join Taliban as they are already in the opposite camp to Ahmad Shah Masood (head of Shoora Nizzar), but have helplessly joined anti-Taliban United Islamic Front for Salvation of Afghanistan with Masood to avoid utter humiliation at the hands of intolerant Taliban. Masood would be left with no option but to leave Afghanistan or share the power with Taliban like other factions, as he would not be able to materialize his dream of Ttajikistan-e-Kabir.

 

 

Where am I? ICSSA Home Page > About Us > Welcome

© 2002 Independnet Centre for Strategic Studies and Analysis (ICSSA). No material on this site may be used in part or in whole by any other publication or website without the written permission of the ICSSA.

Designed, Developed & Maintained byICSSA